Is Banner Display?
Off
Page Content
#ffffff

Selecting the optimal valve type in bicuspid aortic stenosis remains a critical decision in TAVR. A large multicenter analysis of 1,443 patients, published in Circulation, compared outcomes with balloon-expandable (BE-THV) and self-expandable (SE-THV) devices across 29 centers.

At 30 days, death or stroke occurred in 5.1% of BE-THV and 6.1% of SE-THV recipients. At 3 years, outcomes remained similar atβ€”23.7% vs. 26.2% (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.65–1.51). While survival did not differ, complication profiles diverged. BE-THV was associated with annulus rupture and greater mean transvalvular gradients. SE-THV was more often linked to paravalvular regurgitation, additional valve implantation, and permanent pacemaker use (18.6% vs. 11.9%; HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36–0.93).

The findings show that valve type does not influence long-term mortality in bicuspid TAVR, but distinct complication risks emphasize the importance of individualized device selection.

Anonymous user
On
Authenticated user
On
Premium
On
Paid / Sponsored
On
Key highlights
  • 1,443-patient multicenter study compared balloon-expandable (BE-THV) vs. self-expandable (SE-THV) valves in bicuspid TAVR.
  • Three-year death or stroke rates were similar: BE-THV 23.7% vs. SE-THV 26.2%.
  • BE-THV carried more annulus rupture and higher gradients; SE-THV led to more paravalvular regurgitation, additional valve implantation, and pacemaker use.
Source

Giacoppo D, A Alvarez-Covarrubias H, Xhepa E, et al. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Balloon- Versus Self-Expandable Bioprostheses for the Treatment of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis. Circulation. 2025;152(10):639-657. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069323

Thumbnail
Balloon or Self-Expandable? Bicuspid Valve TAVR Shows Diverging Risks
Schedule Date & Time
Speciality
Currency
Sub Speciality
Sub Sub Speciality
Short Description

Three-year outcomes show no survival difference, but valve types carry distinct complication risks.

Release Date
Is Paid
0