Is Banner Display?
Off
Page Content
#ffffff

Acute heart failure (AHF) is frequently complicated by fluid overload, where timely decongestion must be balanced against the risk of renal dysfunction and electrolyte imbalance. The Fluid Management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Subjects Treated With Reprieve Decongestion Management System (FASTR) trial published in the JACC Heart Failure assessed whether the Reprieve Decongestion Management System (DMS) could improve decongestion efficiency compared with optimal diuretic therapy (ODT).

This randomized pilot study enrolled 100 hospitalized AHF patients, of whom 96 received assigned treatment (Reprieve: n=52; ODT: n=44). Participants had a median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 49 mL/min/1.73 m² and a median excess fluid volume of 20 lbs. The primary efficacy endpoint was 24-hour natriuresis, while safety was assessed using a composite of dialysis requirement, doubling of serum creatinine, severe electrolyte disturbances, hypotension, or hypertensive emergency.

The Reprieve system achieved significantly higher 24-hour natriuresis compared with ODT (1,082±487 mmol vs 423±290 mmol; p<0.001). Rates of the composite safety endpoint were similar between groups (31% vs 39%; p=0.42). Reprieve also reduced the duration of intravenous diuretic therapy (median 46 vs 88 hours; p=0.014) and demonstrated faster weight loss (p=0.002), greater net fluid loss (p=0.03), and increased cumulative natriuresis (p<0.001). Changes in serum creatinine were not significantly different between groups (p=0.07).

In this randomized pilot trial, automated diuretic titration facilitated more rapid decongestion without increasing adverse events. Larger trials are required to confirm clinical benefits and long-term outcomes.

Anonymous user
On
Authenticated user
On
Premium
On
Paid / Sponsored
On
Key highlights
  • Reprieve DMS significantly increased 24-hour natriuresis (1,082±487 mmol vs 423±290 mmol; p<0.001).
  • Composite safety endpoint occurred in 31% vs 39% (Reprieve vs ODT; p=0.42).
  • Intravenous diuretic duration was shorter with Reprieve (46 vs 88 hours; p=0.014).
  • Faster decongestion was observed with greater weight loss (p=0.002), net fluid loss (p=0.03), and natriuresis (p<0.001), with no significant creatinine difference (p=0.07).
Source

Udelson JE, Javaheri A, Fudim M, et al. Fluid Management of Acute Heart Failure With the Reprieve System: The Randomized Controlled FASTR Trial. JACC Heart Fail. Published online April 28, 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2026.103062

Thumbnail
Heart Failure
Speciality
Currency
Sub Speciality
Sub Sub Speciality
Short Description

A randomized pilot trial evaluated an automated diuretic titration system against optimal diuretic therapy (ODT) in hospitalized patients.

Release Date
Is Paid
0
Send Notification
Off