Is Banner Display?
Off
Page Content
#ffffff

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) combined with remote patient monitoring (RPM) may offer meaningful long-term value in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). A modeling analysis published in Diabetes Care evaluated whether adding RPM to CGM improves health outcomes and cost-effectiveness compared with self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) and CGM alone.

This Markov model simulated disease progression in a cohort of 5-year-old patients with T1DM across 20-year, 50-year, and lifetime horizons. The model tracked acute complications, including diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and severe hypoglycemia (SH), along with seven chronic complications such as retinopathy, nephropathy, cardiovascular disease, and end-stage renal disease. Clinical efficacy inputs were derived from meta-analyses of pediatric CGM studies and the Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Glycemia (4T) Study.

Over 20 years, CGM increased quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) by 0.09 compared with SMBG, with an additional cost of $8,900. CGM with RPM increased QALYs by 0.37 compared with SMBG, with an added cost of $10,300. When compared directly with CGM alone, CGM with RPM demonstrated a lower incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ($27,400/QALY vs $103,700/QALY), indicating greater economic value. These findings remained consistent across multiple sensitivity analyses and extended time horizons.

The analysis also showed that CGM with RPM remained cost-effective even when achieving at least 30% of the clinical efficacy observed in the 4T study. While upfront costs were higher, reductions in complication-related costs contributed to improved long-term economic outcomes. These findings show that CGM with RPM is associated with better outcomes and favorable cost-effectiveness vs SMBG and CGM alone in pediatric T1DM.

Anonymous user
On
Authenticated user
On
Premium
On
Paid / Sponsored
On
Key highlights

  • Markov model in pediatric T1DM compared SMBG, CGM, and CGM with RPM.
  • CGM increased QALYs by 0.09 with $8,900 higher cost vs SMBG over 20 years.
  • CGM with RPM increased QALYs by 0.37 with $10,300 higher cost and showed a lower ICER vs CGM ($27,400 vs $103,700 per QALY).
  • Results were consistent across analyses, with CGM with RPM remaining cost-effective even at ≥30% efficacy.
Source

Dupenloup P, Chen Y, Prahalad P, et al. Cost-effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring with remote patient monitoring in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes in the U.S. Diabetes Care. Published March 25, 2026. doi:10.2337/dc25-2825

Thumbnail
New CGM Metrics Highlight Rebound and Extended Glucose Events
Schedule Date & Time
Speciality
Currency
Sub Sub Speciality
Short Description

A Markov model analysis in pediatric type 1 diabetes found CGM with remote monitoring increased QALYs and remained cost-effective vs SMBG and CGM alone.

Release Date
Is Paid
0
Send Notification
Off