Is Banner Display?
Off
Page Content
#ffffff

Older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) face increased risk of hypoglycemia, yet treatment decisions are often guided primarily by HbA1c values that may not capture nocturnal hypoglycemia or glucose variability. A qualitative study published in Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology evaluated how standardized continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) reports influenced clinician decision-making in older adults with T2DM.

The analysis included 30 clinicians who reviewed three simulated cases before and after access to CGM reports. Responses were evaluated using Endsley’s situation awareness framework, which examines how clinicians perceive, interpret, and project clinical information during decision-making.

Findings

  • Time-in-range metrics were incorporated into clinical assessment by 90% of clinicians after CGM review.
  • Previously unrecognized hypoglycemia or nocturnal glucose patterns were identified by 93% of clinicians.
  • Treatment plans were modified by 86% of clinicians following review of CGM data.
  • Clinical management changes included deprescribing sulfonylureas, adjusting insulin timing or dosing, and initiating lower-risk therapies such as SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists.
  • Clinicians identified multiple barriers to treatment implementation, including medication cost, limited medication access, housing instability, and food insecurity.

The findings suggest that CGM data provided actionable information beyond HbA1c alone and frequently altered individualized treatment decisions in older adults with T2DM. 

Anonymous user
On
Authenticated user
On
Premium
On
Paid / Sponsored
On
Key highlights
  • CGM reports changed treatment decisions in most clinicians managing simulated cases of older adults with T2DM.
  • Previously unrecognized hypoglycemia and nocturnal glucose patterns were frequently identified after CGM review.
  • Clinicians commonly deprescribed sulfonylureas, adjusted insulin regimens, or initiated lower-risk therapies after reviewing CGM data.
  • Cost, medication access, housing instability, and food insecurity were identified as barriers to implementing individualized diabetes treatment plans.
     
Source

Savoy A, Barboi C, Bibat S, Meanwell E, Shah VN, Weiner M. How Continuous Glucose Monitoring Reports Inform Clinical Decision-Making for Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: Mapping Clinical Workflow to Situation Awareness. J Diabetes Sci Technol. Published online May 15, 2026. doi:10.1177/19322968261449829

 

Thumbnail
CGM
Schedule Date & Time
Speciality
Currency
Sub Sub Speciality
Short Description

A qualitative interview study found 86% of clinicians modified treatment plans after CGM review, including deprescribing high-risk agents and adjusting insulin regimens. 
 

Release Date
Is Paid
0
Send Notification
Off