Is Banner Display?
Off
Page Content
#ffffff

Glucose-lowering therapies have increasingly demonstrated cardiovascular benefits, but direct comparisons between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remain limited. Understanding comparative outcomes may help inform treatment selection in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

In a multicenter retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, investigators compared clinical outcomes among adults with AMI who underwent PCI and initiated either a GLP-1 RA or an SGLT2 inhibitor within 14 days of the index event. The findings were published in the Catheterization & Cardiovascular Interventions. The analysis included 7,201 GLP-1 RA users and 4,252 SGLT2 inhibitor users before propensity score matching.

After one-to-one propensity score matching across more than 50 baseline characteristics, 1,752 patients remained in each treatment group. Outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses, with follow-up extending to one year.

Findings

  • Compared with SGLT2 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists were associated with a lower risk of acute heart failure at 1 year (HR, 0.415; 95% CI, 0.343–0.501).
  • GLP-1 receptor agonists were associated with lower risks of all-cause hospitalization (HR, 0.559; 95% CI, 0.495–0.631), recurrent myocardial infarction (HR, 0.799; 95% CI, 0.710–0.899), and stroke (HR, 0.800; 95% CI, 0.667–0.959).
  • Lower risks of atrial fibrillation (HR, 0.804; 95% CI, 0.693–0.932), major adverse cardiovascular events (HR, 0.788; 95% CI, 0.706–0.881), and acute kidney injury (HR, 0.534; 95% CI, 0.444–0.643) were also observed with GLP-1 receptor agonists.
  • At 30 days, GLP-1 receptor agonists were associated with lower absolute risks of acute heart failure, with an absolute risk reduction of 7.19% (95% CI, 5.66%–8.72%), and all-cause hospitalization, with an absolute risk reduction of 16.61% (95% CI, 14.24%–18.98%).
  • All-cause mortality did not differ significantly at 30 or 90 days but was lower among GLP-1 receptor agonist users at 1 year (HR, 0.700; 95% CI, 0.507–0.967), while rates of cardiac arrest were similar between groups.

The findings suggest that initiation of a GLP-1 receptor agonist after AMI and PCI was associated with lower risks of several cardiovascular and renal outcomes compared with SGLT2 inhibitor therapy.

Anonymous user
On
Authenticated user
On
Premium
On
Paid / Sponsored
On
Key highlights
  • GLP-1 receptor agonists were associated with lower rates of several cardiovascular and renal complications after AMI compared with SGLT2 inhibitors.
  • Reduced risks of heart failure, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, and hospitalization were observed during 1-year follow-up.
  • All-cause mortality was similar early after PCI but was lower with GLP-1 receptor agonists at 1 year.
Source

Khalil I, Sarker P, Ria SG, et al. Comparative Efficacy of GLP-1 RAs Versus SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Real-World Study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. Published online May 31, 2026. doi:10.1002/ccd.70668

Thumbnail
Heart Failure
Speciality
Currency
Short Description

Propensity-matched TriNetX study found lower risks of heart failure, recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, and hospitalization with GLP-1 receptor agonists versus SGLT2 inhibitors after PCI.

Release Date
Is Paid
0
Send Notification
Off