Is Banner Display?
Off
Page Content
#ffffff

A study published in Journal of American College of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Interventions evaluated the association between intravenous (IV) antiplatelet therapy and 30-day cardiovascular and bleeding outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS).
This observational cohort analysis included 389 patients treated between 2012 and 2023 who underwent catheterization within 24 hours of presentation. IV antiplatelet therapy (cangrelor or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors) was administered to 139 patients (35.7%). Inverse probability weighting was used to adjust for baseline differences.
The primary endpoint was 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as all-cause death, ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis. MACE occurred in 29.1% of patients receiving IV therapy (95% CI 21.7%–38.5%) compared with 44.9% of those not receiving IV therapy (95% CI 38.8%–51.6%). Weighted analysis showed an association with lower MACE risk (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.41–0.84).
Major bleeding occurred in 33.9% of IV-treated patients and 42.1% of non-IV patients. No statistically significant increase in bleeding was observed after adjustment (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.54–1.13). Findings were consistent across STEMI and non-STEMI subgroups.
However, treatment allocation was not randomized and thus, the residual confounding cannot be excluded. Study also had modest sample size. The results demonstrate association rather than causation.

Anonymous user
On
Authenticated user
On
Premium
On
Paid / Sponsored
On
Key highlights
  • Intravenous antiplatelet therapy was associated with a lower 30-day risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) undergoing early angiography (weighted HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.41–0.84).
  • No statistically significant increase in major bleeding was observed with IV antiplatelet therapy compared with non-IV strategies at 30 days (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.54–1.13).
  • The reduction in ischemic events was consistent across STEMI and non-STEMI subgroups, with no significant interaction detected.
  • Prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm the safety and effectiveness of IV antiplatelet strategies in patients with AMI-CS.
Source

Elhadad A, El Zouhayri O, Silvain J. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2026;19(3):316–327. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2025.11.015

Thumbnail
Acute Myocardial Infarction
Speciality
Currency
Short Description

In 389 patients with AMI-CS, intravenous antiplatelet therapy was associated with lower 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events without a statistically significant increase in major bleeding compared with non-IV strategies.

Release Date
Is Paid
0
Send Notification
Off