JAK Inhibitors Raise New Safety Questions
Rheumatologists increasingly prescribe JAK inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis and other immune diseases. These oral drugs offer convenience over injectables. Recent global trials flagged cardiovascular risks with JAK-Is compared to TNF inhibitors. Korean doctors now have local data to guide choices. This study published in the Cardiology digs into real-world adverse event reports carefully.
National Database Tracks Real-World Reports
Researchers pulled data from Korea Adverse Event Reporting System database from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2020. They focused on tofacitinib and baricitinib as JAK-Is. TNF-Is included adalimumab, etanercept, and golimumab. Total reports reached 625 for JAK-Is and 4,777 for TNF-Is. Drug-AE pairs numbered 876 for JAK-Is and 7,999 for TNF-Is after analysis.
Cardiovascular Events Show Strong Signals
Disproportionality analysis used reporting odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals from 2x2 tables. JAK-Is showed higher CVE reporting than TNF-Is with ROR 4.90 and 95% CI 2.80-8.59. Major cardiovascular events, thrombosis, and other CVEs all contributed to the signal. Thrombosis stood out strongest at ROR 12.70 with 95% CI 5.10-31.66. These findings align with international concerns about JAK-I safety.
Women and Older Patients at Highest Risk
Signals proved strongest in women with CVE ROR 7.52 and 95% CI 3.06-18.47. Patients over 50 years showed CVE ROR 5.01 with 95% CI 2.02-12.43. Age and sex patterns match ORAL Surveillance trial results. Rheumatologists must weigh these risks against RA control benefits carefully.
Thrombosis Signal Demands Attention
Thrombosis ROR of 12.70 signals urgent need for monitoring. JAK-Is block multiple cytokines, possibly affecting clotting pathways differently than TNF-Is. Baseline CV risk assessment becomes essential before starting therapy. Smoking cessation and statin use may mitigate risks in high-risk patients.
Clinical Implications for Daily Practice
Choose TNF-Is first in RA patients with CV history or risk factors. Reserve JAK-Is for TNF failures after shared decision-making. Screen for thrombosis risk at baseline and follow closely. Report adverse events to KAERS to build better data. Guidelines may shift based on accumulating evidence like this.
Balance Efficacy Against Emerging Risks
JAK-Is transform RA treatment with rapid onset and oral dosing. Safety signals remind us no drug lacks risks. Korean data strengthens global warnings for careful patient selection.
Featured
Off
Page Content
#ffffff
Anonymous user
On
Authenticated user
On
Premium
On
Paid / Sponsored
On
Key highlights
- Researchers analyzed KAERS database from 2015-2020 and identified 625 AE reports for JAK-Is (tofacitinib, baricitinib) versus 4,777 for TNF-Is (adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab), yielding 876 and 7,999 drug-AE pairs respectively
- Disproportionality analysis revealed JAK-Is associated with higher CVE reporting compared to TNF-Is at ROR 4.90 (95% CI 2.80-8.59), driven by strong thrombosis signal at ROR 12.70 (95% CI 5.10-31.66).
- CVE signals proved most pronounced in women with ROR 7.52 (95% CI 3.06-18.47) and patients over 50 years at ROR 5.01 (95% CI 2.02-12.43).
- Study used reporting odds ratios from 2x2 contingency tables to detect safety signals for MACEs, thrombosis, and other CVEs in real-world pharmacovigilance data.
- Findings support preferential TNF-I use in high CV risk RA patients and highlight need for thrombosis monitoring with JAK-Is.
Source
Yoon J, Kim S, Yang BR. Cardiovascular Adverse Events of JAK vs. TNF Inhibitors using the Korean Pharmacovigilance Database. Cardiology. Published online January 30, 2026:1-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000550737
Thumbnail
Speciality
Currency
Sub Speciality
Sub Sub Speciality
Short Description
Korean pharmacovigilance data finds JAK inhibitors linked to 4.90-fold higher CVE reporting vs TNF inhibitors, with 12.70-fold thrombosis risk, especially in women over 50.
User Segments
Release Date
Featured Order
0
Is Paid
0
Send Notification
Off