Is Banner Display?
Off
Page Content
#ffffff

Dual-chamber pacemakers can harm left ventricle function at high burden. Right ventricular (RV) pacing's effect on RV remodeling needs study. In a recent study published in the Arrythmia and Electrophysiology Review, the researchers conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on RV function changes post-RV pacing.

Following PRISMA guidelines, searches covered Embase, PubMed, SCOPUS to March 2024. Studies reported RV parameters: RVEF, sPAP, TAPSE, RV volume, S′, FAC, RIMP, tricuspid regurgitation. Eighteen studies with 1,220 patients qualified. Pooled mean differences assessed pacing effects. Subgroup analyses checked pacing site and duration.

RV pacing tied to S′ drop (−1.35 cm/s, 95% CI −2.36 to −0.34, p=0.009). RVEF fell non-significantly (2.28%, p=0.21); TAPSE (−0.04 cm, p=0.57), RIMP (−0.07, p=0.52), FAC (−0.12%, p=0.95), sPAP (3.73 mmHg, p=0.46). Heterogeneity high (I²>89%). Pacing site mattered: apical pacing hurt TAPSE, S′, FAC, sPAP most; LBBAP showed least impact. Duration affected RIMP (p=0.01).

In this meta-analysis, RV pacing associated with significant S′ decline and variable effects on other RV measures. Apical pacing linked to worse outcomes; LBBAP better. High heterogeneity noted, suggesting further covariate studies.

Anonymous user
On
Authenticated user
On
Premium
On
Paid / Sponsored
On
Key highlights
  • RV pacing significantly reduced S′ (−1.35 cm/s, 95% CI −2.36 to −0.34, p=0.009) across 18 studies with 1,220 patients.
  • Non-significant changes seen in RVEF (2.28%, p=0.21), TAPSE (−0.04 cm, p=0.57), and RIMP (−0.07, p=0.52).
  • Apical pacing associated with greatest negative impact on TAPSE, S′, FAC, and sPAP versus other sites.
  • LBBAP showed least detrimental effects, particularly on sPAP, in subgroup analyses.
  • High heterogeneity (I²>89%) underscores need for studies on pacing site and duration effects.
Source

DeAngelo S, Aryal B, Haghshomar M, et al. Impact of Right Ventricular Pacing Sites on Right Ventricular Function: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2026;15:e02. doi: 10.15420/aer.2025.17

Thumbnail
Right Ventricular Pacing
Speciality
Currency
Short Description

Meta-analysis of 18 studies (1,220 patients) links RV pacing to significant S′ reduction (−1.35 cm/s, 95% CI −2.36 to −0.34, p=0.009); apical pacing worsens outcomes vs left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP).

Release Date
Is Paid
0
Send Notification
Off