Is Banner Display?
Off
Page Content
#ffffff

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) has emerged as a novel modality for atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment, though concerns regarding procedure-related hemolysis persist. This study, published in the Heart Rhythm, compared hemolysis and acute kidney injury (AKI) following microsecond PFA (microPFA), nanosecond PFA (nanoPFA), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients undergoing AF ablation.

A total of 323 patients treated at a high-volume center were included, comprising microPFA (n=186), nanoPFA (n=65), and RFA (n=72) groups. Pulmonary vein isolation was performed with or without adjunctive ablation. 

Hemolysis markers and renal parameters were assessed at baseline, at the end of the procedure, and 24 hours post-procedure. Patients undergoing AF ablation during the study period were included, while specific exclusion criteria were not detailed in the abstract.
PFA modalities were associated with evident hemolysis, which was not observed with RFA. Increases in bilirubin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and free hemoglobin, along with reduced haptoglobin, were noted following PFA. 

After adjustment, LDH (229.0±50.6 vs 198.4±33.8 IU/L; P<0.001) and free hemoglobin (289.3±45.1 vs 263.7±55.0 ng/mL; P=0.043) were higher with microPFA compared with nanoPFA. Hemoglobin reduction and declines exceeding 20 g/L occurred more frequently with microPFA than nanoPFA or RFA. AKI events were infrequent across groups.

PFA was associated with hemolysis, with greater effects observed in microPFA. NanoPFA showed lower hemolysis indices, while severe anemia and AKI remained uncommon.

Anonymous user
On
Authenticated user
On
Premium
On
Paid / Sponsored
On
Key highlights
  • Pulsed field ablation was associated with measurable hemolysis, which was not observed with radiofrequency ablation.
  • Hemolysis markers were higher with microPFA than nanoPFA after adjustment.
  • Hemoglobin decline and drops >20 g/L occurred more frequently with microPFA (44.1% and 58.1%) than nanoPFA or RFA.
  • Hemolysis increased with delivery number in microPFA but not in nanoPFA; acute kidney injury events were rare (3 vs 1 vs 0).
Source

Ding L, Xiang B, Qi Y, et al. Hemolysis and Kidney Injury After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Microsecond vs. Nanosecond Pulsed Field Ablation. Heart Rhythm. Published online March 1, 2026. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2026.03.1941

Thumbnail
AF Ablation
Speciality
Currency
Sub Speciality
Sub Sub Speciality
Short Description

A comparative study (n=323) assesses hemolysis and kidney outcomes across microPFA, nanoPFA, and radiofrequency ablation.

Release Date
Is Paid
0
Send Notification
Off