Tags
Is Banner Display?
Off
Page Content
#ffffff

A new study published in the Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics has found that personal continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) worn by diabetic patients during hospitalization offer reliable glucose readings, closely aligning with laboratory and point-of-care (POC) measurements in noncritical inpatient settings.

Researchers enrolled adult patients with diabetes who were already wearing outpatient-inserted CGMs at the time of hospital admission. The study analyzed 3,316 CGM-POC reading pairs from 101 patients and 771 CGM-Lab reading pairs from 97 patients, collected within five-minute intervals.

For CGM-POC comparisons, the mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was 13.7% overall, with 14.4% for Dexcom and 11.8% for Libre sensors. MARD increased to 22.6% during hypoglycemia (glucose <70 mg/dL), indicating less precision in low glucose ranges. For CGM-Lab comparisons, MARD was 13.6% overall.

Over 98% of both CGM-POC and CGM-Lab pairs fell within zones A and B of the Clarke Error Grid, indicating clinically acceptable accuracy. No significant correlation was found between CGM accuracy and vital signs such as blood pressure, hemoglobin levels, glomerular filtration rate, or oxygen saturation.

The study also assessed in-hospital glycemic metrics. Time below range (TBR) averaged just 2.2%, time in range (TIR) was 58.7%, and time above range was 39.9%. Glucose variability was 31.2%. TIR levels met inpatient consensus recommendations, and overall CGM performance was comparable to hospital-inserted devices.

Anonymous user
On
Authenticated user
On
Premium
On
Paid / Sponsored
On
Key highlights
  • The study analyzed 3,316 CGM and point-of-care reading pairs and 771 CGM and laboratory reading pairs collected from hospitalized patients.
  • The mean absolute relative difference was approximately 13% overall, but increased to about 23% during episodes of hypoglycemia.
  • More than 98% of both CGM-POC and CGM-Lab reading pairs fell within zones A and B of the Clarke Error Grid.
  • No observed interference was reported in CGM accuracy from vital signs or laboratory parameters.
  • The time in range (TIR) and glucose variability during hospitalization met current inpatient guideline standards.
Source

Dumitrascu AG, Perry M, Chindris AM, et al. Real-World Performance of Personal Continuous Glucose Monitors During Hospitalization. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2025;27(8):613-622. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0639  

Thumbnail
CGM in In-Patient Settings
Speciality
Currency
Short Description

Personal continuous glucose monitors provide reliable glucose readings, closely similar to laboratory and point-of-care measurements in noncritical hospitalized patients.

Release Date
Is Paid
0