Is Banner Display?
Off
Page Content
#ffffff

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with a wide QRS complex; however, up to 30-50% of patients do not respond. The QRS Index, which quantifies QRS shortening after CRT, has been proposed as a potential marker of response. A systematic review and meta-analysis published in the Journal of Clinical Medicine evaluated the association between QRS Index and CRT response.

A search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane identified nine studies including 1,274 patients. Among these, 760 (59%) were classified as responders and 514 (41%) as non-responders, based on clinical, echocardiographic, or combined criteria. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic.

The QRS Index was higher in responders compared with non-responders, with weighted mean values of 16.14 ± 13.19 versus 7.22 ± 14.96. The pooled mean difference was 8.76 (95% CI 6.45–11.06; I² = 45%; p < 0.00001).
Meta-regression analysis showed that lower left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) values were associated with a greater difference in QRS Index between responders and non-responders (β = −0.0483; 95% CI −0.0938 to −0.0029; p = 0.0372).

The findings indicate that QRS Index values are higher in CRT responders, supporting its potential role as a marker of response. Further studies are needed to standardize its clinical use and assess its prognostic value.

Anonymous user
On
Authenticated user
On
Premium
On
Paid / Sponsored
On
Key highlights
  • CRT response was observed in 59% (760/1,274) of patients across nine studies.
  • QRS Index was higher in responders (16.14 ± 13.19) vs non-responders (7.22 ± 14.96).
  • Mean difference in QRS Index was 8.76 (95% CI 6.45–11.06; p < 0.00001; I² = 45%).
  • Lower LVESV was associated with greater QRS Index differences (β −0.0483; p = 0.0372).
Source

Corrado E, Stabile F, Jaramillo S, et al. QRS Index as a Predictor of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med. 2026;15(8):3074. Published 2026 Apr 17. doi:10.3390/jcm15083074

Thumbnail
ECG AF
Speciality
Currency
Short Description

A meta-analysis of 9 studies (n=1,274) compares QRS Index in CRT responders vs non-responders 

Release Date
Is Paid
0
Send Notification
Off