Is Banner Display?
Off
Page Content
#ffffff

RP during TF-TAVR may lower the risk of major vascular events but increase overall complications and bleeding, according to data from the SURF-TAVR registry, published in Clinical Research in Cardiology.

The study included 4,224 TF-TAVR patients treated across 15 centers in Italy and France between January 2020 and August 2023. Centers were classified based on routine use of RP versus no-routine protection (nRP). Propensity score matching adjusted for baseline differences.

Overall vascular complications were higher in RP centers (12.1% vs. 8.3%; p < 0.001), whereas major vascular complications were lower (1.1% vs. 2.4%; p = 0.009). Bleeding events were more frequent in RP centers (9.7% vs. 6.6%; p < 0.001), but major bleeding rates were similar (4.8% vs. 3.8%; p = 0.111).

These results suggest that while RP may protect against severe vascular injury, it could introduce additional procedural risks. Tailoring vascular access strategies and balancing procedural safety with complication risk remain essential in optimizing TF-TAVR outcomes.

Anonymous user
On
Authenticated user
On
Premium
On
Paid / Sponsored
On
Source

Cozzi O, Ratan P, Costa G, et al. Secondary access and routine protection wire for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the SURF-TAVR registry. Clin Res Cardiol. Published online October 20, 2025. doi:10.1007/s00392-025-02730-4

Thumbnail
Routine Wire Protection Shows Mixed Outcomes in TF-TAVR
Schedule Date & Time
Speciality
Currency
Sub Speciality
Sub Sub Speciality
Short Description

The SURF-TAVR registry finds fewer major vascular events but higher overall complications and bleeding with routine wire protection

Release Date
Is Paid
0