Is Banner Display?
Off
Page Content
#ffffff

The IRONMAN-II trial was a prospective, multicenter, single-blinded, noninferiority randomized study conducted across 36 centers in China. Patients with myocardial ischemia and 1 or 2 de novo target coronary lesions were eligible and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a thin-strut sirolimus-eluting iron bioresorbable scaffold (IBS) or a cobalt chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES). A total of 518 patients were randomized (259 per group) between March 10 and December 13, 2022. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed in the first 25 participant pairs. The study was published in the Journal of American College of Cardiology.

The primary endpoint was 2-year angiographic in-segment late lumen loss (LLL). At 2 years, mean LLL was 0.28 (0.52) mm with IBS and 0.23 (0.43) mm with CoCr-EES (difference 0.08 mm; 95% CI −0.02 to 0.18; P_noninferiority=0.03). Mean quantitative flow ratio was 0.90 (0.13) versus 0.92 (0.09) (difference −0.02; 95% CI −0.04 to 0; P_noninferiority=0.05). OCT-derived mean flow area was 6.92 (3.48) mm² versus 6.64 (2.44) mm² (difference 0.27; 95% CI −0.09 to 0.63; P_noninferiority<0.0001).

Two-year target lesion failure occurred in 7.4% versus 5.4% (HR 1.37; 95% CI 0.69–2.73; P=0.37). No scaffold thrombosis occurred with IBS; one stent thrombosis occurred with CoCr-EES.

The sirolimus-eluting IBS met noninferiority criteria for angiographic and physiologic endpoints at 2 years. Longer-term follow-up is required to determine potential late effects after scaffold resorption.

Anonymous user
On
Authenticated user
On
Premium
On
Paid / Sponsored
On
Key highlights
  • In 518 patients with 1–2 de novo lesions, IBS was noninferior to CoCr-EES for 2-year in-segment late lumen loss.
  • Quantitative flow ratio and OCT-derived flow area also met noninferiority criteria.
  • Target lesion failure rates were similar between groups (7.4% vs 5.4%; P=0.37).
  • No scaffold thrombosis occurred with IBS; one stent thrombosis occurred with CoCr-EES.
  • Longer-term follow-up is needed to assess outcomes after complete scaffold resorption.
Source

Gao R, Song L, Fu G, et al. Sirolimus-Eluting Iron Bioresorbable Scaffolds vs Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Trial (IRONMAN II). J Am Coll Cardiol. Published online February 11, 2026. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2025.12.024

Thumbnail
Drug Eluting Stent
Schedule Date & Time
Speciality
Currency
Short Description

The IRONMAN-II randomized trial compared a sirolimus-eluting iron bioresorbable scaffold with cobalt chromium everolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease and de novo lesions.

Release Date
Is Paid
0
Send Notification
Off