Is Banner Display?
Off
Page Content
#ffffff

Conventional coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring may not fully capture lower-density calcification linked to vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque. A study published in the European Journal of Preventive Cardiology developed a vulnerable calcium index (VCI) to quantify sub-Agatston CAC burden and evaluated its association with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and high-risk plaque (HRP) features.

The analysis included 1,837 asymptomatic participants from the CLARIFY CT calcium score registry and 1,075 patients from the SCOT-HEART trial presenting to chest pain clinics. Multivariable analyses adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors, baseline statin use, and Agatston score. Associations between VCI and coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-defined HRP features were also evaluated in SCOT-HEART participants with paired CT calcium score and CCTA imaging.

Findings

  • Median follow-up was 4.8 years in CLARIFY and 4.9 years in SCOT-HEART.
  • Higher VCI independently corresponded with increased MACE risk in both cohorts (adjusted HR 1.12; 95% CI 1.02–1.22; p = 0.02 and adjusted HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.03–1.31; p = 0.02, respectively).
  • Participants in the highest quartile of adjusted model risk showed substantially higher event rates than those in the lowest quartile (CLARIFY HR 25.0; SCOT-HEART HR 33.7; p < 0.005 for both).
  • Adding VCI to Agatston score improved C-index for MACE prediction from 0.62 to 0.66 in CLARIFY and from 0.72 to 0.75 in SCOT-HEART (p < 0.001 for both).
  • VCI also improved net reclassification beyond Agatston score in both cohorts (CLARIFY 0.52 [95% CI 0.40–0.64]; SCOT-HEART 0.72 [95% CI 0.48–0.94]; p < 0.005 for both).
  • In SCOT-HEART, higher VCI values corresponded with all assessed CCTA-defined HRP features, with ORs ranging from 1.45 to 1.85 (p < 0.001 for all).

The findings suggest that sub-Agatston CAC burden captured by VCI corresponded with both adverse cardiovascular outcomes and vulnerable plaque characteristics. Incorporating VCI into CAC reporting may improve cardiovascular risk stratification beyond conventional Agatston scoring. 

Anonymous user
On
Authenticated user
On
Premium
On
Paid / Sponsored
On
Key highlights
  • VCI independently corresponded with higher MACE risk in both cohorts.
  • VCI improved MACE discrimination and risk reclassification beyond Agatston score.
  • Higher VCI values corresponded with multiple CCTA-defined HRP features.
  • Sub-Agatston CAC assessment may refine cardiovascular risk stratification.
Source

Singh P, Hoori A, Lee J, et al. Sub-Agatston Coronary Calcification on Non-Contrast Cardiac CT and Cardiovascular Risk. Eur J Prev Cardiol. Published online June 1, 2026. doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwag285

Thumbnail
CT Scan
Speciality
Currency
Short Description

An analysis of 2,912 participants from CLARIFY and SCOT-HEART linked sub-Agatston CAC burden with HRP features and MACE risk. 

Release Date
Is Paid
0
Send Notification
Off